Keystone Today

Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Bob Casey (D-PA) and John Fetterman (D-PA) sent a letter to the Maryland Air National Guard and the Air National Guard Readiness Center to request a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) regarding the Air Force and National Guard Bureau’s proposal to lower the altitude floor at which pilots can fly in the Duke Military Operating Area (MOA) to as low as 100 feet Above Ground Level (AGL). The letter follows concerns from North Central Pennsylvania organizations and residents about the possible effects of this proposed change on quality of life and on the environment in the Commonwealth’s largest collection of public lands.

“Low, loud, and frequent flights could disrupt livelihoods in a region that has built its identity on outdoor recreation and bucolic tranquility,” the Senators wrote. “The proposed changes to the use of the airspace over the PA Wilds region may threaten the rich natural resources of the area, damage quality of life in the Wilds, and threaten the vitality of the growing outdoor and tourism economy.”

Without a full EIS, it is impossible to accurately determine the cumulative effects of lowering the altitude floor may pose to the lives and livelihoods of North Central Pennsylvania residents. Many state officials, local leaders, conservation groups, and community members share the Senators’ concerns about the Duke Low MOA, highlighting its potential negative impacts on local economies, public health and safety, wildlife, and outdoor recreation.

Full text of the letter is below and the signed PDF is HERE.

Kristi Kucharek, GS-13

Airspace NEPA Program Manager

Air National Guard Readiness Center

3501 Fletcher Avenue

Joint Base Andrews, MD 20762

Major Jeffrey Andrieu

Maryland Air National Guard

175th Wing

Martin State Air National Guard Base

2701 Eastern Boulevard

Middle River, MD 21220

Dear Ms. Kucharek and Major Andrieu:

We write to express our concerns regarding the Maryland Air National Guard’s (MD ANG)

proposed Duke Low Military Operations Airspace (MOA) over the Pennsylvania Wilds in North

Central Pennsylvania and to request a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) of the

proposed airspace.

The Pennsylvania Wilds is a 13-county region containing the greatest concentration of public

lands in Pennsylvania, including 29 state parks, eight state forests, 50 state game lands, two

National Wild and Scenic Rivers, thousands of miles of trails, the largest elk herd in the

Northeast, and the Allegheny National Forest. Investing in these abundant natural assets through

trails, recreation-focused small businesses, and related improvements has drawn tourists from

across the country, resulting in $1.8 billion in annual economic activity from tourism and

outdoor recreation. It has also created plentiful recreation opportunities for residents, making

the Wilds an even more desirable place to live. The ability to enjoy the serene natural landscape

is a cornerstone of the region’s identity and way of life, and the promotion of this natural beauty

is a critical component of its economic future.

The current Duke MOA permits military aircraft to fly between 8,000 and 17,000 feet above sea

level. The MD ANG has proposed a new MOA which would permit aircraft to fly as low as 100

feet above ground level, directly above the Pennsylvania Wilds region. This modification would

allow low-level training flights for up to four hours each day, three days per week (170 days

annually). Low, loud, and frequent flights could disrupt livelihoods in a region that has built its

identity on outdoor recreation and bucolic tranquility. The proposed changes to the use of the

airspace over the PA Wilds region may threaten the rich natural resources of the area, damage

quality of life in the Wilds, and threaten the vitality of the growing outdoor and tourism

economy.

We are joined by many state officials, local leaders, conservation groups, and community

members in expressing concerns about the Duke Low MOA, highlighting its potential negative

impacts on local economies, public health and safety, wildlife, and outdoor recreation. These

citizens and leaders have their communities’ best interests at heart. A “Finding of No Significant

Impact” trivializes their concerns and does a disservice to the families who call the Wilds home

and work to ensure that this region is building toward a brighter future.

We also understand that the U.S. military needs realistic training environments for a variety of

mission sets, and Central Pennsylvania is proud to support these training needs. The Air National

Guard must remain ready to defend our Nation and its interests from a wide range of threats,

including China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea.

Nonetheless, we question the long-term necessity of the Duke Low MOA given the airframes the

MD ANG intends to fly there. The primary justification for the proposed lowering of the MOA’s

floor is to “accommodate the training requirements for A-10 aircrews,” following shifts in the

availabilities of other regional training areas.1 But as you know, Air Force leaders have signaled

the need to retire the A-10 airframe for years, due in part to concerns that the plane is vulnerable

to modern air defense systems. The current Chief of Staff of the Air Force, General C.Q. Brown,

has publicly stated the Air Force’s intent to retire all A-10s from service by 2029. Congress

supported an initial round of A-10 retirements in the Fiscal Year 2023 National Defense

Authorization Act.

While we do not mean to adjudicate the ongoing debate over the A-10's continued viability, we

do observe that the airframe’s future is uncertain which further weakens the case for the Duke

Low MOA. A major airspace decision with long-term consequences—allowing all aircraft to

permanently fly as low as 100 feet above ground level—may have negative consequences that

outweigh its benefits.

In accordance with National Environmental Policy Act, federal agencies must complete an

Environmental Impact Statement when a proposed federal action may “significantly affect the

quality of the human environment.” Given the abundant natural resources of the Pennsylvania

Wilds, the extensive public concern and opposition, and the strategic need to prepare for today’s

near-peer threats, it is essential that the Air National Guard comprehensively analyze the

cumulative effects of the proposed Duke Low MOA and evaluate reasonable alternatives to

achieve the department’s goals. Accordingly, we urge the Air National Guard to complete a full

EIS to ensure the proposal’s benefits and drawbacks are thoroughly and transparently assessed.

We appreciate your consideration of this request.

Original source can be found here.